✘ lianyi@lianyideMBP ~ ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
Request timeout for icmp_seq 5
Request timeout for icmp_seq 6
Request timeout for icmp_seq 7
Request timeout for icmp_seq 8
Request timeout for icmp_seq 9
Request timeout for icmp_seq 10
Request timeout for icmp_seq 11
Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
^C
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
✘ lianyi@lianyideMBP ~ ping 1.0.0.1
PING 1.0.0.1 (1.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=242.151 ms
64 bytes from 1.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=261.108 ms
64 bytes from 1.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=282.122 ms
64 bytes from 1.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=306.658 ms
64 bytes from 1.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=329.773 ms不用1111，只用cisco的opendns
全都在180ms左右，差距
本帖最后由 shijinqiang 于 2019-4-11 22:03 编辑
运营商耍了花样 明显被劫持了
https://0d077ef9e74d8.cdn.sohucs.com/rnlaNzf_jpg
糟老头子坏得很